Showing posts with label Vincent Cassel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vincent Cassel. Show all posts

Thursday, 28 March 2013

Trance



Danny Boyle is fast assuming ‘national treasure’ status: he’s a warm spirited, generous interviewee, fantastically talented theatre director , and persuaded the Queen to play a role in his superb Olympic opening ceremony – before turning down the opportunity to become a knight of the realm. Here, he returns to his primary focus – movie making – with Trance, a London-set psychological crime caper starring James McAvoy, Rosario Dawson and Vincent Cassel.


Cassel is Franck, a criminal mastermind intent on stealing a valuable Goya from an art auction. His man on the inside is Simon (McAvoy), a young man with serious gambling debts and some dubious connections. But their carefully plotted heist goes badly wrong, Simon sustains a serious bang on the head and with it the painting – and his memory – are gone. Desperate to retrieve the £27.5m artwork, Franck employs beautiful hypnotherapist Elizabeth Lamb (Dawson) to try and unlock the information stored deep in Simon’s subconscious. But does she have criminal intentions of her own? And can we trust any of the central protagonists?

The film opens brilliantly, with Simon’s laconic voiceover talking us through the reassuringly old school theft, culminating in a bizarre stand-off between he and Franck in which, for reasons unknown, a grinning Simon attacks his employer – only to end up unconscious and with blood oozing from a nasty head wound. Making his escape from the scene, Franck soon discovers that he’s been double crossed – the Goya is missing. What follows is a slick thriller which combines elements of Christopher Nolan’s oeuvre (especially Memento and Inception) with some typical gangster clichés – but cannot hold a candle to Nolan’s output.

This is a film with very little heart, thanks largely to its inability to scratch beneath its glossy surfaces. And boy is it glossy. Vast swathes of the action take place in polished, mirrored rooms filled with huge flat-screen televisions and monitors. Reflections play a huge part in the action, with less-than-subtle hints that what we see is only an illusion. Of course, this is wholly necessary in a film which concentrates so intently on the idea of memory (be it false or otherwise), but it actually becomes tiresome after a while.

Thankfully, there are more than enough twists and turns to keep the viewer’s interest, with ideas of perception and mind-control to the fore, and a morally ambiguous trio of central protagonists being constantly reassessed – just who should we be rooting for? Better acting performances might have convinced us to take sides earlier, but Cassel is particularly lame here – he’s not the same actor when he abandons his native French for English.

To her credit, it’s Dawson who performs most admirably. Her introduction is the film’s finest moment – a polished and superbly edited view of her ‘curing’ her patients’ myriad problems overlaid with a soothing and cleverly crafted voiceover. She quickly becomes the centre of the action – the beneficiary of her (now failed) relationship with Boyle, perhaps – but she proves that she’s more than capable of holding her own alongside bigger names .

As the film hurtles to its conclusion, the action becomes darker and is all the more interesting for it. It’s a shame Boyle didn’t explore the murkier recesses of his characters’ minds earlier, but the looping twists and revelations keep coming right to the movie’s climax. That, though, might have diluted the film’s sense of disposability – and this is Boyle and long-time collaborator John Hodge having fun. There seems to be no moral or message here – just a desire to entertain and toy with their audience. In that sense, Trance is a success. And we’ll forgive the film its obvious flaws because… well, because it’s a Danny Boyle film.

Thursday, 3 February 2011

Black Swan


Natalie Portman looks like a ballerina. Waif-like, delicate and fragile, she’s physically perfect to play the role of Nina Sayers – a dancer cast as the lead in Swan Lake. With a supporting cast including Barbara Hershey and Vincent Cassel, surely Black Swan couldn’t fail to impress...

Portman’s Nina is beautiful yet naive – a perfect fit for the innocent side of the dual role of Swan Queen. Problematically she lacks the fire, unpredictability and sexuality required to play the character’s titular alter-ego. Nina s a dream role for an actress – it requires a portrayal of great physicality, enormous skill and some real acting chops. And Portman doesn’t disappoint. She’s absolutely fantastic throughout.

Her performance hinges on her being believably unhinged as the intensity of the role, her repressed home life and her sexual awakening combine, culminating in a nervous breakdown of sorts. As the pressure grows on her to embrace the darker side of her personality so her anxieties increase, manifesting themselves in hallucinations, self-harm and an increasingly fractured personality – personifying itself in the form of fellow dancer Lily (Mila Kunis).

Sadly Nina is the only character in the film who’s not a one-dimensional stereotype. Cassel’s rapacious director is crudely drawn and delivers some truly awful dialogue, Winona Ryder’s washed up ballet star is little more than a plot device and Hershey chews up the scenery as Nina’s wicked mother. Perhaps these gaudy caricatures are designed deliberately but they are too creakily created to be convincing.

All the clichés you would associate with mental breakdown are present and correct: overbearing mother, druggy nightclub scene, a freaky music box, lashings of blood, lesbian sex, doppelgangers, hallucinations, gallery of portraits with eyes which follow you around the room, etc, etc. Subtle it is not.

The film looks amazing, though. A palate of blacks, whites and greens is decorated with sparing splashes of colour – particularly the crimson of blood and slashes of lipstick. Mirrors are a recurring theme – rarely has a character spent so long staring at their own reflection. Very early in the film we see Nina metaphorically cut in two by a long mirror and it doesn’t take a genius to work out that mirrors will be involved in the film’s denouement.

Ultimately it’s a film saved by a committed performance from Portman, some excellent cinematography and a neat eye for detail. But it’s preposterously over the top, very predictable and a little unstable. Thankfully it doesn’t take itself too seriously and as such it’s entertaining - if unfulfilling.