Showing posts with label Denmark. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Denmark. Show all posts

Sunday, 1 April 2012

The Kingdom: I&II – Original Broadcast Edition


No stranger to controversy, Lars von Trier has been delighting, appalling and surprising cinema goers for well over twenty years. He pioneered the Dogme 95 school of filmmaking, brought Bjork to the big screen and allowed his production company to produce hardcore porn. Mainstream success has not been easy to come by for von Trier, with even his biggest UK successes remaining largely ‘arthouse’. So it’s little wonder that his early career in Danish television has received little attention over here. But the release of a boxed set of supernatural hospital drama The Kingdom could be about to change that.

The Kingdom is a cutting-edge hospital staffed by an offbeat cast of characters, including a new-age director, an egotistical Swedish neurosurgeon and a reckless medical student. And their faith in science is tested as a series of supernatural episodes occurs: a ghostly young girl appears in a lift shaft; a phantom ambulance appears every night; an unnatural pregnancy affects one of the nurses and all the while a malingering patient attempts to communicate with those on the ‘other side’…

The opening credits create an instantaneous sense of intrigue. At odds with the modern hospital setting, the start of every episode features a prologue set in the misty and mysterious ‘bleaching pools’ upon which the hospital would later be built. A solemn voice narrates as the sepia toned action unfolds on screen, describing the ancient marshlands where cloth workers bleached their wares, enveloped by thick clouds of fog. It’s a simple enough scene, but slow pan of the camera and the deliberate movement of the workers on screen add certain gravity to proceedings. An air of menace and unpredictably is also evident as we are told that the building of the hospital was designed to help eradicate ignorance and superstition in favour of science. Clearly this will not be the case: the old world is literally breaking into the new.

Sadly, the impact of the credits as almost undone by the dreadful theme music which blares from the screen immediately aftermath. Perhaps a product of their time, they have not dated well at all. Like a mid-90s cop drama, they thud from the screen with the word ‘Kingdom’ repeated ad infinitum over cheesy background action. It’s woefully out of place in the midst of such an atmospherically spooky drama.

Thankfully, the director proves that he is capable of producing excellent credit sequences at the end of each episode. In an obvious homage to Alfred Hitchcock, von Trier himself appears as a presenter in dinner jacket and bow-tie as the end credits role to offer a summation of the plot and a hint at what will come in the next show. His language is quaint and antiquated as he poses rhetorical questions to the audience and occasionally mocks the actions of the characters. It’s completely unnecessary yet utterly charming – not only for von Trier’s determination to appear on the other side of the camera, but also for his geeky hand gestures, as he implores the audience to “be prepared to take the good with the evil.”

Just as The Kingdom is filed with ideas of good and evil, so it is filled with morally ambiguous (or often dubious) characters. Chief among these is Swedish neurosurgeon Stig Helmer (Ernst-Hugo Järegård). He’s a man with a whole collection of enormous chips on his shoulders – not least his utter disdain for all things Danish. Despite that, he’s played with some charm by Järegård. His aged face manages to convey just enough rumpled dissatisfaction with his incompetent colleagues to convince you that his heart is in the right place – some of the time. Despite being a fierce critic of malingerers and timewasters, he has secrets and faults of his own – not least a malpractice case arising from a botched operation which left a young girl brain-damaged.

It’s testament to the excellent writing that The Kingdom’s characters are so well-developed. It would have been very easy to rely on clichéd stereotypes in a series such as this, but each character is given room to breathe and time to develop. Some, like Helmer, arrive fully formed, others, such as his nemesis Jørgen Krogshøj (Søren Pilmark) develop more steadily. Initially, he’s little more than a sniping pedant, but he reveals himself as being rather more warm-hearted and ‘resourceful’ than he seems.

Whether the same credit can be extended as far as Sigrid Drusse (Kirsten Rolffes) is less clear. She’s the malingerer in question, inventing reasons to stay in the hospital as an excuse to carry out her paranormal investigations. Initially, she seems easy to dismiss, but as the plot unfolds her snooping becomes increasingly credible. She, however, remains irritating. Despite that, Rolffes gives a brilliant performance as the irritating old woman. One scene in particular, as Drusse attempts to speak to a ghost is an acting masterclass. With only a candle flame foregrounded and her face in the background of the frame, Drusse asks yes/no questions of the spirit world. How the flame reacts to her questioning determines what answer she has received. It’s a beautifully lit and wonderfully acted monologue – and completely compelling.

There are a whole host of other fascinating characters engaged in all manner of hare-brained schemes and storylines. A Masonic lodge rules behind the scenes, the happy-clappy hospital director attempts to introduce his hapless methods of motivation and a medical student uses a severed head to seduce a nurse. With workplace drug-dealing, a doctor transplanting a cancerous liver into himself and a pair of Down’s Syndrome sufferers acting as a Greek chorus, it’s a wonder that the plot makes any sense whatsoever.

Somehow, however, it does. Von Trier has been extremely brave in throwing so many characters and so many story-strands into the mix from the very outset. Much of the success of the show lies in not underestimating its audience – each storyline is distinct and unusual enough to hold the attention and every character is interesting enough to sustain the interest. The hand-held camerawork also ensures that the viewer is constantly kept in the midst of the action. And if things ever do flag, an injection of humour is never far away.

The Kingdom is very funny – in a number of ways. There is out and out slapstick, humorous dialogue and enough absurd action to ensure that it appeals on numerous levels – and every episode contains an anti-Danish speech from Helmer (which often ends with him screaming “Danish scum” into the night sky). Often the more humorous scenes are effectively cut with the more supernatural elements to create a cohesive whole which never becomes bogged down in one particular element of the story.

Season one becomes increasingly interested in the supernatural elements of the story as it nears its conclusion, culminating in a series of cliff-hangers which are partly addressed as season two begins to unfold. It would be churlish to give too much away here about the happenings of the second series, but it’s fair to say that there are also plot points which remain unresolved as it ends. Sadly, they will remain that way. Following the climax to the series, both Ernst-Hugo Järegård and Kirsten Rolffes passed away. Shorn of arguably two of the most important characters, there was no way The Kingdom could continue and plans for a third series were shelved.

Despite the slightly unsatisfactory conclusion, The Kingdom is a simply brilliant series. It wears its influences on its sleeve proudly – clearly owing a debt to Twin Peaks and the X Files – features memorable characters and situations, and combines drama and comedy to great effect. Of course, it’s no surprise that a Danish series about the supernatural was never likely to be broadcast on TV in Britain. Instead, an inferior series (written by Steven King) attempted to replicate the appeal. Don’t bother with the remake – search out the original instead.

Wednesday, 28 March 2012

In A Better World


The Oscars’ Best Foreign Language Film is an award beset by controversy. The nomination process allows just one film from each nation, and movies with multinational backing are disqualified by virtue of being too hard to credit to just one country. Recently, this bizarre process saw Marion Cotillard win Best Actress for La vie en rose – a film which didn’t even make the Best Foreign Language Film shortlist. Is the latest film to be garlanded with the prize really worthy such an honour or merely the Academy’s latest faux pas?

In A Better World tells the parallel tales of Anton (Mikael Persbrandt) and Claus (Ulrich Thomsen) – two men suffering their own family crises. Anton is a doctor spending time away from home at an African refugee camp. His continual absences have left his marriage in tatters. Claus, meanwhile, has just lost his wife to cancer. His teenage son, Christian (William Jøhnk Nielsen), is struggling to contain his grief and anger at his bereavement.

After moving to a new school, a twist of fate sees Christian befriend Anton’s bullied son Elias (Markus Rygaard). The new boy is tougher and more streetwise than his cowed friend, and helps Elias take revenge on his tormenters. Later, the boys are relaxing with Anton, who has returned home. Anton intervenes in a playground quarrel only to find himself humiliated – he’s smacked in the face by another child’s parent.

Embarrassed and angered by the situation, Anton offers no retaliation. When the kids find out where Anton’s assailant works, they insist that he confront him again. Anton literally turns the other cheek, and returns to Africa – a stance the hot-headed Christian is unable to tolerate. He and Elias decide to take matters into their own hands with dire consequences.

Back in Africa, Anton faces a moral dilemma of his own. Will he treat a man who has been mutilating pregnant women? Should he allow himself to be intimidated again? Whatever he decides to do, will he be able to live with the repercussions? And will Claus ever repair his fractured relationship with Christian?

Director Susanne Bier has certainly got a great eye for scenery. The opening of In A Better World is an Africa painted with colourful brush strokes. With the sun pictured low in the sky, illuminating jagged rock faces, she ensures the vibrancy of the location is obvious to all. Add laughing children and bouncing balls and the mixture becomes even more potent. From here, she cuts directly to a dark church service: the funeral of Christian’s mother. The contrast is jarring and dramatic – instantly Bier has established her visual style.

Sadly, her storytelling is not as imaginative. Despite weaving numerous different strands and relationships together across different continents, the narrative here is rather lumpen and predictable. This is a flawed film rescued by stellar acting and some excellent set pieces.

It’s to Bier’s credit that she draws such performances from the young leads. Both Rygaard and Nielsen are utterly convincing in their roles. The relationship they form is also extremely well written and believable. From the moment they meet – seated together at school by virtue of their shared birthday – it is apparent that they will become friends. Elias’ vulnerability is written all over Rygaard’s screwed up face, whilst Nielsen is a picture of determination and injustice. The characters need each other – none more so than in a well judged scene where they lie for each other when questioned by the police over a vicious beating.

The adult performances are also uniformly good. It’s a little frustrating that, at times, Bier over-eggs the pudding rather than letting the acting and script speak for itself. A wonderful moment between Anton and wife Marianne (Trine Dyrholm) tells the audience everything they need to know about the state of the couple’s relationship – only for some clumsy exposition to be shoehorned into a contrived meeting with Elias’ schoolteachers. It’s a scene which should have been left on the cutting room floor.

The same cannot be said of Anton’s various confrontations with bullies pushing their weight around. Unlike the younger characters, he takes a pacifists approach – and the scenes are all the more powerful for his dignified and stoic acceptance of violence towards himself. When the same kinds of conflicts occur in Africa, however, he is forced to make harder choices – and the pain of doing so is written all over Persbrandt’s face. His is the stand-out performance in the movie.

Sadly, In A Better World overreaches itself somewhat. Attempting to run so many parallel storylines means that unequal weight is attached to them. Claus’ relationship with Christian, for example, feels a little like a footnote. A tighter focus would have helped eliminate such problems. Predictability is also an issue. It doesn’t take a genius to spot where reconciliations and recriminations will occur. Even the locations for these moments are signposted from the outset.

In A Better World is not a bad film by any stretch of the imagination. It’s not worthy of being an Oscar winner either. It’s a little too overwrought and far too keen to tie up its loose ends. Thankfully, some splendid acting and cinematography just about make up for the shortcomings of the plot, as well as the contrived and slightly problematic conclusion.