Showing posts with label British Cinema. Show all posts
Showing posts with label British Cinema. Show all posts

Friday, 8 June 2012

Ill Manors



Musicians making movies has often proved to be a recipe for disaster: very few have made the transition with any degree of success. The latest to try his hand at breaking into film is Ben Drew – more commonly known as Plan B. His debut feature, Ill Manors, has been developed from a Plan B single of the same name. Only it hasn’t been developed all that effectively...
A multi-stranded melange of intertwined storylines encompasses drug-dealing, gang culture, Russian gangsters, prostitution and any other facet of crime you’d care to imagine, whilst half-heartedly making clumsy social comment on children abandoned by their parents. It’s clunkily constructed and unsophisticated but, at least initially, seems promising.
For around thirty minutes, Drew displays skill and originality. He quickly establishes the criminal underclass in which his film is based through a high-speed burst of imagery and a rapped back-story for each of the characters he focuses upon. It’s kinetic, exciting and absorbing. Sadly, it doesn’t last. The rap-commentary largely disappears, surfacing only occasionally as the narrative progresses and the interesting visuals give way to a more prosaic and uninvolving style.
The plot, too, fails to sustain itself. Drew reaches too far and tries to tell too many tales. As a result, characters are often unbelievable caricatures with inexplicable motivations. One youngster, Jake, seems to become a gun-wielding gang member within mere minutes of being a timid teenager- it’s utterly unbelievable and makes it very difficult to sympathise with him.
Indeed, sympathy is in short supply for anyone here. Although the characters inhabit an immoral world, there are numerous opportunities for them to display some humanity. They seldom do. And when there’s nobody to sympathise with, it’s impossible to attach any emotional weight to what’s going on.
There’s a moment where it looks like the narrative threads have been neatly wrapped up only for new characters to be introduced and a whole new element added to the story. It’s overkill – the film just goes on and on. Eventually it becomes quite gruelling – not least in a sequence of enforced and repeated prostitution.
Thankfully, John Cooper Clarke appears in the final act to add his unique brand of acerbic wit to proceedings. His acidic narrative poem serves as a reminder that sometimes less is more: a lesson Drew desperately needs to learn before making another movie.

The Angels' Share


Whilst Ken Loach is famed for his gritty realism and social commentary, his later output has mellowed slightly. The whimsical Looking For Eric employed Monsieur Cantona as himself in a light-hearted comedy with a social conscience. His latest offering continues the theme. Although grounded in the social and economic deprivation of Glasgow, The Angel’s Share is refreshingly optimistic and uplifting: a genuine feelgood film.

The opening pulls together a disparate group of young offenders: following a fabulously funny opening scene featuring drunkenness, high-speed trains and voices from the heavens, Loach introduces us to a motley collection of petty criminals. They’re presented in extreme close-up as a judge intones their assorted crimes. Their smirking faces display the disregard that they, and Loach, hold the proceedings in.

The core of the film’s characters are drawn from this bunch. As is often the case in Loach’s movies, these actors are strictly non-professionals – many making their acting debuts. Chief among these is Robbie (Paul Brannigan), the only member of the group facing serious charges. Escaping from a serious GBH charge with 300 hours of community service, thanks largely to the imminent arrival of his unborn child, Robbie faces the very real possibility of losing everything in an ongoing family feud which he is unable to place in his past.

Luckily for Robbie, he falls under the supervision of Harry (the excellent John Henshaw), a working class Mancunian who forms a strong bond with his younger charge. He’s a wonderful salt-of-the-earth character with a heart of gold – and Robbie blossoms under his care. Toasting the birth of Robbie’s son, the younger man begins to discover a talent for whisky tasting which is developed under Harry’s gaze. And when a priceless barrel of Malt Mill becomes available for auction, Robbie sees an opportunity to break the vicious circle he’s trapped within.

What follows is a cleverly plotted, pacy crime caper with characters who are well-crafted, believable and likeable – a rarity in modern cinema. It’s impossible not to root for Robbie, thanks largely to Brannigan’s magnetic and magnificent performance. Charming yet vulnerable and aggressively handsome, he’s a wonderful screen presence who credits Loach with saving him from a life of crime. He’s already gone on to seduce Scarlett Johansson in the upcoming Under The Skin – it would be little surprise to see him achieve further success.

Brannigan’s is not the only creditable performance here, however. Every actor who appears before the camera is brilliant. Quite how Loach draws such performances from amateurs is unclear – but his skill cannot be denied. The dialogue seems largely improvised and it’s easy to assume that many of the characters are real lawyers, auctioneers and tour guides. But perhaps not. Either way, what appears is some of the most fantastic dialogue I’ve heard in a film in some time.

The Angels’ Share is a wonderful film which marries reality and redemption brilliantly: it warms the heart like a fine single malt.

Friday, 27 April 2012

Trainspotting


Trainspotting was the book which launched Irvine Welsh into the literary stratosphere: an incendiary, controversial exploration of Edinburgh’s heroin subculture. Characterised by Welsh’s uncanny and innovative approach to his native dialect and filled to the brim with memorably unsavoury characters, the novel remains the high watermark of Welsh’s career – so much so that he’s sought to repeat the success by revisiting the chaotic world of his Leith junkies twice - in sequel Porno and newly released prequel Skag Boys.

Around the time of novel’s release, Scotland was enjoying a cinematic renaissance – despite Mel Gibson’s best attempts to rewrite Celtic history in the lamentable Braveheart. The vastly superior Rob Roy and Danny Boyle’s blackly comic Shallow Grave both hit the silver screen in the mid-nineties to great acclaim. With the establishment of the Scottish Parliament on the horizon and even the Scottish football team in the headlines – albeit thanks to a Paul Gascoigne inspired defeat at Euro 96 – transforming Trainspotting’s source material into a movie was a no-brainer. But nobody could have anticipated the wider impact of Danny Boyle’s magnificent film.

Drawing heavily on pop-culture, Trainspotting’s appeal was worldwide: the energetically eclectic soundtrack included Britpop big hitters Damon Albarn and Pulp alongside US luminaries Iggy Pop and Lou Reed (both famed heroin users). The attractive young cast gave uniformly excellent performances and the superb mixture of gritty realism and fantastical drug sequences ensured the film had wide and enduring appeal. But 16 years on from its release, does Trainspotting truly stand the test of time?

Trainspotting sets its stall out from the outset: its characters are a bunch of reprobates and losers on the peripheries of ‘normal’ society. Their goals and desires bear little relation to what a modern audience might expect – with Mark Renton’s memorable anti-capitalist ‘choose life’ monologue playing over the opening scenes of shoplifting and one of the most inept five-a-side football performances ever committed to celluloid. It’s a fantastic introduction to the leads, freeze-framing them with their names flashed on the screen, quickly establishing their personalities and flaws as Renton’s voiceover places them deliberately and consciously outside of the norm: they might be losers, but they chose to live that way rather than live in a world they actively resent.

Renton’s speech has become famous in its own right: satirised, imitated and intoned across cultural platforms, quoted and reinterpreted, reproduced and reprinted. Ewan McGregor’s embittered delivery of the lines makes apparent the utter disdain Renton has for the mundane aspirations of the masses as he lists the insipid materialistic goals they strive for: washing machines, cars, compact disc players. For Renton, these seemingly endless choices offer no choice at all. He chooses not to choose life. And why? “Who needs reasons when you’ve got heroin?”

In that opening salvo, played to the bouncing rhythm of Iggy Pop’s Lust For Life, the tone for the film is set and the audience is already asked to question the goals and aims they have previously set themselves, forcing them to understand what drives the junkie mindset. With that in mind, Trainspotting takes a deliberate step back from moralising or passing judgement on drug consumption, trusting instead that the home audience will arrive at their own conclusions after being presented with the evidence.

Arguably Trainspotting’s most iconic scene – and certainly its most significant – occurs in an excrement-encrusted toilet cubicle. Suffering from painful junk withdrawal and with his stomach churning, Renton is forced to evacuate his bowels– including the opium suppositories he has secreted in his back passage - in ‘the worst toilet in Scotland’. Retching and gagging, he’s forced to plunge his hands into the filthy toilet bowl, gradually disappearing head first into the lavatory – only to emerge on the other side in a clear blue sea. Brian Eno’s beautiful Deep Blue Day soundtracks the scene as Renton swims serenely to the ocean floor to retrieve the suppositories – shimmering and glimmering like pearls on the sea-bed.

It’s a wonderfully effective scene, juxtaposing the filth and depravity of heroin dependence with the clarity and ecstasy of being utterly, wonderfully wasted. For many, the disgust and revulsion of Renton’s shit-stained desperation is nauseating – but for him the pay-off is worth it. Too often, films shy away from the realities of drug taking and fail to illustrate the positive effects they have on their takers. Here, Danny Boyle gives a perceptive and brave insight into why people seek such highs and the depths they are willing to plumb to do so. As Renton himself observes, "People associate it with misery, desperation and death, which is not to be ignored. But what they forget is the pleasure of it, otherwise we wouldn't do it.”

That Trainspotting manages to be so insightful and thought provoking is remarkable given its compact running time. In just over ninety minutes it manages to cram in enormous numbers of well-drawn characters, set-pieces and storylines. Although screenwriter John Hodge and Danny Boyle dispensed with whole characters and vast swathes of Welsh’s original narrative, the film is an uncannily accurate representation of the novel.

Hodge and Boyle’s excellent screenplay and direction are, of course, key in this. But perhaps even more important are the performances of the cast. Star-making turns from Ewan McGregor, Jonny Lee Miller and Robert Carlyle imbue their characters with power, wit and verve scarcely seen in such ensemble casts. Carlyle, particularly, creates a monstrously memorable character in Begbie: a swaggering, amoral alcoholic dispensing his own unique brand of hypocritical advice to all and sundry.

Given Carlyle’s diminutive physical stature, to present such a convincingly violent sociopath is quite some achievement. His mastery of the Scottish dialect clearly helps - not least in his guttural pronunciation of the word ‘cunt’. But the real strength of his performance is in his wildly expressive eyes: shifty, suspicious, menacing and fearful in equal measure. It’s a revoltingly hypnotic mask – made all the more grotesque by his absurd moustache. In a movie brimming with memorable characters, he’s the one who lingers longest in the mind.

Granted, Begbie is an overblown caricature. But, like the film’s other characters, he is worryingly real. Elements of Sick Boy, Tommy, Spud, Renton et al are instantly recognisable, however exaggerated. They are deeply flawed and immoral young men who, thanks to some wonderfully charismatic and committed performances, remain endearingly sympathetic: especially Ewan Bremner’s hapless Spud – ironically the actor with the least successful post-Trainspotting career.

Underpinning the storyline and the characters is Trainspotting’s superb soundtrack. Lust For Life roared back into the charts on the back of the film’s success, thrusting Iggy Pop (a reference point throughout) back into the limelight, Lou Reed’s Perfect Day become a morose pub anthem and Underworld’s Born Slippy became the tune of choice for binge drinkers all over the world. But the song-selection was far more subtle at times: changing drug cultures were signposted through song, the characters’ sensory addictions were mirrored in music and Spud’s heartfelt singing at Tommy’s wake unites the characters in their futile grief.

Voiceover, too, plays a huge part. Often films with vast swathes of narration lack dynamism, but combined with flurries of short scenes, swift editing, music and exaggerated sound effects, Trainspotting avoids such pitfalls. Indeed, sound effects play a significant role in drawing the audience into the pop counter-culture depicted: Renton’s gurgling bowels, Spud’s slurped milkshake and Begbie’s torn pool table all succeed in blanking out the outside world and focusing attention on the pathetic minutiae of their small-time lives.

What really cemented Trainspotting in viewers’ minds, however, was way it tapped into the cultural zeitgeist. The cross-generational soundtrack reflected the derivative Britpop sound of the mid-nineties as well as utilising some of its biggest and best acts: the aggressively marketed and hugely successful OST (and its second volume) was almost as ubiquitous as the iconic poster campaign.

Nothing more than black and white stills of the characters and bold orange text, the poster became instantly recognisable and was endlessly and shamelessly ripped off. Designers Stylorouge were determined to reflect the multiple identities of the film’s characters and the disparate and separate narratives of the novel: individual shots in montage fulfilled the brief perfectly. The stunningly simple design said little about the movie and was, accordingly, a big risk – which paid off handsomely in the form of numerous design and industry awards.

Whilst Boyle has occasionally talked of reuniting the cast to film Porno, McGregor is not at all keen. For this, we should be grateful. Repeating the success of Trainspotting would be impossible. It’s a film totally of its time but utterly timeless. Its intertextual blend of drug culture, music, sport and cinema references was and is perfect: the greatest ever screen depiction of youth culture will never grow old.

Monday, 5 September 2011

Kill List


Bucking the trend for generic horror remakes or cringe-worthy 3D, Kill List presents audiences with something entirely new. Whilst clearly owing a large debt to The Wicker Man, it takes the horror genre in an uncomfortable new direction, drawing the audience into a kitchen sink drama with lashings of menace and scenes of almost unbearable tension.

Opening with an extremely long domestic scene, director Ben Wheatley begins to pile on the fraught sense of claustrophobia which characterises the movie from the very outset. Jay (Neil Maskell), an ex-squaddie on civvy street, is a tightly wound individual – constantly on the brink of volcanic eruptions. As he and wife Shell (Myanna Buring) host a dinner party for friend Gal (Michael Smiley) and his new partner, Fiona (Emma Fryer) grievances simmer just beneath the surface. It’s almost too real and clearly chock full of improvised dialogue. The camera lingers slightly too long on faces and reactions, the food is clearly being digested. When one barbed insult too many falls from Shell’s lips, Jay flips violently.

Becalmed by the laconic Gal, the two discuss returning to work – a priority for Jay whose lavish lifestyle has seen he, Shell and their son Sam fall into financial trouble. It quickly becomes clear the two mates are hitmen – and they are soon back in the saddle, accepting a ‘kill list’ from their mysterious employer. There will be three jobs before their employment finishes.

It seems like pretty standard stuff – two hitmen reuniting for one last job. It’s much more than that, however. From the extended opening it’s clear that Wheatley’s intention is not to create a paint-by-numbers thriller. Instead he devotes time to drawing the audience into Jay and Gal’s world. The handheld camera constantly keeps the viewer on top of the action and the occasional eruptions of violence keep them on the edge of their seat.

The acting is uniformly excellent. Maskell and Smiley quickly create an entirely believable friendship founded on shared experiences, punctuated with violence and love in equal measures. And there’s just enough evidence to suggest Gal has more than a platonic interest in Jay’s wife. It’s a multi-faceted relationship the likes of which is seldom seen in the genre – or any other.

As the film evolves it maintains the personal interest, exploring (but never judging) the two protagonists as they embark on their paid killing spree. At times their morals are questioned – as are the viewers’ – and Wheatley makes no attempt to provide answers as Jay goes spectacularly ‘off list’. The violence is realistic, brutal and visceral – but occasionally the motives behind it are more ambiguous.

The pace quickens as the film nears its denouement, moving in mysterious and creepy new directions until a thrilling and unsettling climax. But it’s the style of the piece which marks Kill List out: creepy, claustrophobic and unapologetic. Wheatley’s even brave enough to leave some questions defiantly unanswered. Thrilling stuff from a real British talent.